Circumcision. Parity for the sexes?

BMJ. 2010 Jul 21;341:c3888. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3888. Circumcision. Parity for the sexes? Bhopal R. Comment on BMJ. 2010;340:c2728. Bewley and colleagues’ arguments against female genital mutilation1 are irresistible, so why are they not applied to the male equivalent, circumcision? Their arguments against medical involvement in even “nicking” the female genitalia are compelling on logical grounds, but there isContinue reading “Circumcision. Parity for the sexes?”